One challenge of investing in a forest is determining when it reaches financial maturity. This is when the owner’s cost of keeping an asset exceeds expected returns. Timber complicates this thinking because a tree is both the “product” and the “factory,” which continues to appreciate over time through adding volume and value. Harvesting trees resets the production process. So we approximate financial maturity in forestry by comparing the annual increase in forest value with the investor’s expected rate of return from other investments of similar risk and duration.
Thinking in Terms of Forest Finance
A forest’s value can be well established at two points in time: at the start and at the end of the rotation. At the start, establishment (site preparation and planting) costs are easily known and quantified. At the end, forest values reflect future timber revenues. We rely on two discounted cash flow (DCF) techniques to assist us: compounding investment inputs to estimate future values, and discounting anticipated future returns to estimate present values.
Financial analysis often supports the “investment decision” by helping investors rank investment options and evaluate investment risk. For example, this analysis helps answer questions of “when to harvest?” and “when does forest management pay?” And when an investor asks, “Do we really need to manage forests to make money? Is it worth the extra effort instead of just letting trees simply regrow?” Basic financial analysis indicates: YES.
Read the entire article: https://www.landthink.com/managed-timberlands-create-value-improve-investment-returns/
